Behavioral Record Analysis & Documentation

Get out of
your personal hell.

Pro-se parents fighting high-conflict custody don't lose because they're wrong.
They lose because they can't keep up with the paper trail, the patterns, and the procedural traps.
BRAD does.

See how it works Get access

Built by a pro-se parent who couldn't afford to keep losing. Now in private beta.

section 01 — you

You're not crazy.
They're running a doctrine.

High-conflict ex-partners don't fail at communication.
They execute a procedural stall doctrine with high reliability.
BRAD names every move so you can see them coming and document them when they land.

pattern · socratic stall

"What new information needs to be discussed?"

Replying to your proposal with three clarifying questions instead of a yes/no.
Looks like engagement. It's procedural delay.

pattern · ROFR theatre

"I offered. You refused."

A trade request becomes a fake Right-of-First-Refusal offer in the record.
BRAD knows: trade requests are not ROFR offers.

pattern · thread necromancy

A six-month-dormant thread, suddenly active.

Reviving an old thread to back-fill notice of a unilateral decision.
Looks like communication. It's burying the timeline.

pattern · ADR sabotage loop

Refuse step one. Force step three. Refuse step three.

Bypass-step-up. Same closed loop, different decade.
BRAD tracks the ADR ladder so the judge can see the loop on paper.

pattern · presence fiction

"I was there." (You weren't.)

Claiming presence while grandparents drove, fed, slept-over.
Documentary record contradicts. BRAD captures the contradiction.

pattern · selective release

One child released. The other locked inside.

The strongest fact pattern in the case is usually the moment you didn't realize you needed video.
BRAD anchors it to the agreement chain so the breach is undeniable.

section 02 — receipts

Built so you wouldn't
have to remember.

A while back, the user's ex held one daughter back at the door of a planned exchange — a summer-evening concert in the park with friends in a local band. The user got it on video. Then life got in the way.

Two years later, drafting a contempt motion, the question came up: what was the date?

BRAD pulled it in seconds. A Thursday in early summer — "Rock Foo" at the Hilde Performance Center^* Plus the eight-email agreement chain, the same-day reaffirmation in the morning hours, every quote with a timestamp, all linked.

"I built BRAD so I wouldn't have to remember. It worked."

found by BRAD

→ 8 emails over 18 days
→ Both parents' messages, timestamped
→ Same-day written reaffirmation
→ Linked to the video evidence
→ Decree clauses auto-cited

Same-day written reaffirmation, then breach within hours, with video. Hard to beat for a contempt motion.

* The "real find" above describes a real event from a real case. Identifying details — band, venue, exact date, names — have been changed for public viewing. The actual record in the operator's case is intact, accurate, and admissible. We tell the story this way so you can see the pattern without identifying the family involved.

section 02b — the math that broke me

The bills come
before the answers.

Two real receipts from the founder's own case, before BRAD existed.
Both legal. Neither resolved anything.

cost · 20-minute call

$500

A 20-minute phone call with a lawyer.
Not legal work — a paid interview where he decided whether he'd take the case.
Two weeks of rent for someone deciding if I get to give them more rent.

cost · parenting consultant

$3,000 + $350/hr

Parenting Consultant retainer plus hourly.
Burned through before we could resolve a single scheduling question — the other parent's counsel expanded scope into a laundry list of accusations under "the standard model."
We never got to the actual ask.

BRAD exists because that math doesn't work for pro-se parents.
The industry extracts rent before the answer arrives — and most of the time, the answer never arrives at all.
BRAD is the answer arriving without the rent.

Receipts are real, anonymized as before. Dollar amounts are exact.

section 03 — doctrine

BRAD is opinionated.
That's the point.

Pro-se parents lose at the threshold because they file kitchen-sink motions.
BRAD doesn't let you.
Three doctrine rules are baked into every output:

rule 01

Show, don't argue.

Banned from court output: incapacity, intent, emotional conduct.
Allowed: "Father was available. Mother declined. Third-party care was used."
Enforcement, not narrative.

rule 02

Clarity over volume.

437 unilateral decisions does not become a 437-incident motion.
It becomes a sentence of context plus 5 surgical incidents.
BRAD ranks them.

rule 03

Kids are not witnesses.

Their observations train BRAD's awareness — they never appear in court output.
Alienation backfire risk is a category error pro-se filers can't afford.

"BRAD is not a document tool. It is a case-execution operating system. Built so you can run the case without leaving the app."

section 04 — the flow

Drop in chaos.
Walk out with a paper trail.

01

Drop everything in

Email exports, 2houses / OFW threads, photos, PDFs, voice notes.
BRAD ingests, hashes, embeds, and tags every item.
02

Patterns surface automatically

Withholding. Plan-hijack. Selective capacity. Compliance theatre.
BRAD names what it sees and counts how often it happens.
03

Ask in plain English

"What date was the lockout?"
"Where did the ex claim ROFR was offered?"
"How many medical decisions in January?"
BRAD finds the receipts.
04

Produce filing-ready output

Motions, exhibit packets with Bates stamps, judge-readable summary sheets.
Doctrine guardrails enforced at build time.

BRAD home dashboard — calendar with month view, todos sidebar with anonymized example items, recent activity feed

BRAD home dashboard on iPhone — same calendar and todos in mobile layout

your case, on every screen

section 05 — who this is for

For the parent the
system was built against.

If you're nodding at any of this:

→ You're pro se because the legal bills broke you.
→ You learn about your kids' medical visits from your kids.
→ Your ex's responses are real-time. Yours have to be measured.
→ You've been told to "just go to counseling" three different times.
→ You have years of receipts and no way to find anything in them.
→ You're tired. They're counting on it.

What BRAD is not:

× Legal advice. BRAD assists; it does not represent you.
× A lawyer replacement. Hire one if you can.
× A magic motion-generator. The doctrine is real and the rules are strict.
× An "AI legal" hype product. Built by a parent for parents.
× Yours to abuse. Coercive control patterns work both ways. We watch for it.

section 06 — pricing

Coming soon.
When we publish, it'll be flat.

commitment 01

Transparent

One number on the page. No tiers gated behind a sales call. No surprise add-ons.

commitment 02

Portable

Your data is your data. Export anything, anytime. No lock-in, no court-order trap.

commitment 03

Hardship-aware

If the standard rate doesn't work for your situation, contact us. Quietly handled, case by case.

Pricing is locked once the founding-tester cohort is in.
Until then, request access — the rate is inside the approval email.

private beta